Home > Sharepoint 2013 > Sharepoint Exception Handling Best Practice

Sharepoint Exception Handling Best Practice


Reply NIck S says: April 28, 2013 at 1:30 am Hi Matt, In #4: String.IsNullOrEmpty(listItem["MyField"]) doesn't really make sense - listItem is SPListItem and not a String. Please contact tech support" whenever a unhandled exception occur. If anyone wishes to comment on the topic I'd be very interested in hearing opposing views and ideas - I'd still consider myself learning the best practice approach to exception handling Again, I am not saying it is a right or wrong one, its just one I use, and after I saw that post on CodeProject, yeesh. :) I would be interested http://internetmairie.com/sharepoint-2013/sharepoint-2013-error-handling.html

These handlers log errors and let the user interface display a friendly error message. It shows how to create the ErrorVisualizer control and how to add the view (ProductDetailsControl class) to the ErrorVisualizer. For unknown or unexpected exceptions, you should display a generic error message that explains that there is an unknown problem. a Site URL. http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/4420/sharepoint-development-in-c-best-way-to-deal-with-error-handling/4423

Sharepoint Exception Handling Best Practice

Is there a way to easily handle functions returning std::pairs? share|improve this answer answered Jul 30 '10 at 22:28 community wiki Rob Wilson Good call on the thinking of helpdesk teams - write errors & warnings to somewhere they're Yes, you get a lot of "The specified name is already in use" and other such pointless e-mails, but it does let me know when something bad has happened or to Lee Dumond's post Friends Don't Let Friends catch (Exception) explains this nicely.

share|improve this answer answered Apr 24 '12 at 9:56 Andy Burns 4,611819 Andy, thanks for your answer. +1 Poor form on Microsoft's part for forcing us to use this I'm aware the I should do proper try/catch in my code, but for large teams I'd like to be sure that a web part never crashes the page, but always shows how to handle the exception in my webpart? Sharepoint 2013 Write To Uls Log In general, exception handling for a SharePoint application is not very different from any other .NET Framework application.

catch (Exception ex)   {       this.Controls.Clear();       this.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(ex.Message));   }    Randy - http://sharepointhawaii.com/randywilliams Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:38 PM Reply | Quote 1 Sign in to vote What the architect meant Sharepoint 2013 Error Handling Failure to follow this guideline can result in unexpected behavior in your code and hard-to-find bugs. The view is a child control of the ErrorVisualizer control. There are some good articles written for .NET in general including Scott Mitchell's Exception Handling Advice for ASP.NET Web Applications, Daniel Turini's Exception Handling Best Practices in .NET and Russell Allen's

The Error event in UserControl never gets fired, see details here: http://weblogs.asp.net/vga/archive/2003/06/16/8748.aspx What I can't find is any general way to catch errors occurring in postback events, such as the click The most common form of exception handling I see is something along the lines of: try { // code } catch (Exception ex) { // handle exception } The problem is I'm not sure what benefits this truly brings but for me this is just out of habit. http://www.dotnetspark.com/kb/301-log-error-exception-text-file.aspx http://blog.myitside.com/?tag=how-to-create-a-custom-error-log-in-c What do you mean by “start over”?

  1. In this textbox the user can input e.g.
  2. protected new virtual void Render(HtmlTextWriter writer) { base.RenderWebPart(writer); } protected new virtual void CreateChildControls() { base.CreateWebPartChildControls(); } protected new virtual void OnInit(EventArgs e) { base.InitWebPart(e); } protected new virtual void OnLoad(EventArgs
  3. Matt says: May 27, 2014 at 10:44 pm You're absolutely right and i'm guessing that's what Nick was referring to as well.
  4. Wherever possible handle the specific exception.
  5. We have talked a lot about how to use the class, but we haven't even looked at the class yet.
  6. Meaning, you could do something like create a new exception handling class for your WebPart that would inherit from the ApplicationException base class so that you could capture non-fatal errors.
  7. Privacy statement  © 2016 Microsoft.
  8. Would it be ok to eat rice using a spoon in front of Westerners?
  9. You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em.
  10. The code that would go in the unhandled exception handler is often the same for each Web Part.

Sharepoint 2013 Error Handling

Could you add a flag variable to “open” and “close” error message? Project Euler #4 : Largest palindrome from product of two n-digit numbers in python What exactly is a "bad" "standard" or "good" annual raise? Sharepoint Exception Handling Best Practice If you have private methods where you catch exceptions, rethrow them and let the general exception handling catch them. Exception Handling In Sharepoint 2013 All rights reserved.Newsletter|Contact Us|Privacy Statement|Terms of Use|Trademarks|Site Feedback TechNet Products IT Resources Downloads Training Support Products Windows Windows Server System Center Browser   Office Office 365 Exchange Server   SQL Server

Privacy statement Help us improve MSDN. check my blog Make a suggestion Dev centers Windows Office Visual Studio Microsoft Azure More... Javier de Hoyos says: August 7, 2013 at 11:25 pm Hi Matt, Thanks for your post, very useful. One thing to be aware of is disposing SPWeb or SPList objects. Sharepoint 2013 Logging C#

Some of my own personal preferences clash slightly with other advice that exists and like anything to do with SharePoint, often circumstances may dictate the path you need to take. This way the technical team really are made aware of the error, and the user gets an error page (custom of course! - never display the stack trace or yellow ASP.NET Reason is like most others here write, your web page still runs, even though your webpart crashes. this content Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:18 AM Reply | Quote Answers 0 Sign in to vote In client code you can customize error handing by handling the endRequest event of the PageRequestManager

Catch the Most Specific Type of Exception Always try to catch the most specific type of exception. This way, if an error has to be // rendered, the host can prevent the ProductDetailsControl from being displayed. For example, consider the situation of validation code in the list item event receiver.

Methods at a higher level in the call stack may have more information about the task being performed.

The ErrorVisualizer control makes it easier to display technical errors and hide the view. A ThreadAborted exception will be raised. ASP.Net Controls.Web Parts are not exclusive to SharePoint, they are part of the Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 and are essentially just web controls. The view.

Take the GetList function in SPWeb. If these locations aren't regularly monitored or accessible by the people who need to know about the errors, then it is essentially no better than swallowing the errors in the first Attempt “ + retryCount); if (retryCount == 3) throw; } } This code tries to execute a Web service. http://internetmairie.com/sharepoint-2013/reporting-services-add-in-for-sharepoint.html C# Copy catch(Exception unhandledException) { ILogger logger = SharePointServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance(); logger.LogToOperations(unhandledException, “Could not connect to the database”); } In some situations, you should also write exception information to the application's trace log.

C++ Get min / max value of a static array at compile time Print the digital root Small Diwali gifts, from an overseas visitor in India during the festive period? Instead, I should catch specific exceptions. Javier. MSDN has version-specific editions regarding Handling and Throwing Exceptions.

Just to be safe. For example, lower-level methods in a configuration manager might throw a KeyNotFoundException if a configuration key could not be found. However, if it is not an unexpected exception, and your code can compensate for the exception, it is often helpful for debugging purposes to write the exception information to the trace In some cases, exceptions indicate problems that require action by the end user.

Alphabet Diamond Setting up a source using ID and limiting the items you can select. share|improve this answer answered Jul 30 '10 at 18:37 community wiki James Love add a comment| up vote 1 down vote Steve and James both offer good advice -- and it We typically do the same thing -- specific catches where possible and generic catches around the whole thing. This blog will cover a number of topics encountered both past and present in my world of SharePoint in Perth, Western Australia.

Most sharepoint books seems to be lacking in that area. Not a brilliant answer (essentially, "handle all exceptions") but it seems to work okay, and it was because I wanted a better error message for the user too. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed PostgreSQL function not executed when called from inside CTE Is the ability to finish a wizard early a good idea?

Or delete the literal control on next atempt. If the validation fails with an unhandled exception, the list item's pending changes should not be made. On another note, I've also implemented a httpmodule to catch all errors and send me an e-mail on any error that happens in sharepoint.