Home > Severe Error > Severe Error Registering Catalina Type Requestprocessor

Severe Error Registering Catalina Type Requestprocessor

Once you get your production system back up and running, you can concentrate on Mark's suggestions, which are, specifically: 1. Red HatSite Help:FAQReport a problem Arcturus Technologies, Inc. How long has your application been in production? CONTINUE READING Join & Write a Comment Already a member? weblink

Show 2 replies 1. But unfortunately, we are not looking to upgrade our production environment at this point of time. p > Thanks, > Venkat > > --- On Tue, 10/8/10, VenkateswaraRao Eswar <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > From: VenkateswaraRao Eswar <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: WARNING: Error registering request My hastily-scheduled trip was fallout from a change to the OS that unearthed a really sloppy application bug that up until then had been able to tinker with memory that it

I spot a theme. Thanks in advance. Well, there are no non-default configurations in Tomcat besides the one I have given above.

Upgrading from 5.0 to 6.0 shouldn't be too painful: just remember that you shouldn't try to use your server.xml from your 5.0 install to go to 6.0. The most noticeable thing about the upgrade will be better performance all around. 2. Reading the sample mod_jk.conf file that ships with mod_jk is very instructive, so do that before you come crying to us. 3. Instead, use the stock 6.0 server.xml as a basis, and see what changes you'll need to make.

That might be the case of two instances of tomcat are running. When applied the same to JDK 1.5.0_15, I am getting the below errors repeatedly before resulting in "OutOfMemoryError". This article will de… Java App Servers Setting up IBM HTTP Server for starting/stopping from WAS console Article by: Radek There are numerous questions about how to setup an IBM HTTP Covered by US Patent.

If not can you point me towards a forum that maybe able to help me out?Thanks for the info Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 2. Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions. Any idea how to fine tune it. 0 Question by:totoron Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google LVL 26 Best Solution byarober11 Have you see this: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200603.mbox/%[email protected]%3E Anyway may be worth scheduling a daily Upgrading to newer versions is defenetely a good solution.

Manish Hatwalne Ranch Hand Posts: 2596 I like... http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.user/202253 I am digging deeper into this now. The solution to the second problem is probably to downgrade your wep application, and re-think your next steps. Frequency not very consistent.

But unfortunately, we are not looking to upgrade our production environment at this point of time. > Any alternate solution to this issue with the current jdk/tomcat/Apache proxy versions instead of have a peek at these guys Related to this is the fact that software often breaks due to changes from the outside. The most noticeable thing about the > upgrade will be better performance all around. > > 2. A simple cron entry, run from the owning user-id (hopefully not root) should suffice on a Unix/Linux box e.g. # Bounce the Tomcat instance @ 02:02 daily 02 02 * *

Solved Apache tomcat fine tuning Posted on 2010-05-30 Java App Servers 1 Verified Solution 8 Comments 878 Views Last Modified: 2013-12-02 Hi my tomcat die every week. Usually, one of the following things has occurred: 1. Upgrading to newer versions is defenetely a good solution. check over here Since it is production issue, could you please provide a solution for JDK 1.5.0_15 ASAP? Let me know if you need any details.   SEVERE: Error unregistering mbean javax.management.RuntimeOperationsException: Object name cannot be

Any pointers on this one would be highly appreciated! When you're talking software, it's common that it is broke, and you don't know it yet. I don't know that Tomcat 5.0 is even supported anymore and even in places like the JavaRanch, you're not going to find much remaining expertise for anything that old.

This suggests that there is an error while creating another instance of Tomcat by connector/Apache.

That is normal, 8080 handles the HTTP requests while 8009 is used for telling Tomcat to shutdown. You released a new version of your web application and didn't properly test it The solution to the first problem is, of course, to reverse the configuration change and resume normal And do you think that this TCinstance is still able to serve requests. (Because this is ourproduction environment we can't do much testing with these servers andhaven't seen the error on Please turn JavaScript back on and reload this page.

I almost ended up in Chicago one day on a panic basis because of a case like that. Resources: http://tomcat.apache.org/migration.html(I thought there was an "upgrade" or "migration" page on the Wiki, but it appears there is none... I do hope this article will wrap things up and become a reference for this task. this content I don't know that Tomcat 5.0 is even supported anymore and even in places like the JavaRanch, you're not going to find much remaining expertise for anything that old.

Generally speaking, these kinds of things don't just magically start to happen in a production system. Tried not running with security tried with default security. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter for tech news and trends Membership How it Works Gigs Live Careers Plans and Pricing For Business Become an Expert Resource Center About Us Who We WARNING: Error registering request FW: SEVERE: Error registering Catalina:type=Valve,name=StandardContextValve,path=/test,host=localhost SEVERE: Error registering Catalina:type=Valve,name=StandardContextValve,path=/test,host=localhost java.util.ConcurrentModificationException SEVERE error in log files catalina problem PLease Discussion Navigation viewthread | post Discussion Overview groupusers @

Thanx n Regards Puneet Munjal William Brogden Author and all-around good cowpoke Rancher Posts: 13074 6 posted 11 years ago That sounds like you already have an instance of Tomcat posted 4 years ago I am having strange problem in the Apache-Tomcat connector that we have for our system. How long has this InstanceAlreadyExistsException - > OutOfMemoryError condition been happening. The solution to the second problem is probably to downgrade your wep application, and re-think your next steps.

This is perhaps the easiest thing you can possibly do, since the APIs are (in theory, anyway) backward compatible. Minha contaPesquisaMapsYouTubePlayNotíciasGmailDriveAgendaGoogle+TradutorFotosMaisShoppingDocumentosLivrosBloggerContatosHangoutsOutros produtos do GoogleFazer loginCampos ocultosPesquise grupos ou mensagens Tomcat › Tomcat - User Search everywhere only in this topic Advanced Search WARNING: Error registering request ‹ Previous Topic Next That new memory is defective. All rights reserved.

I'm using mod_jk, but as I see a similar message, I'll try this too. This tool uses JavaScript and much of it will not work correctly without it enabled. Once you get your production system back up and running, you can concentrate on Mark's suggestions, which are, specifically: 1. Upgrade mod_jk2 to mod_jk (yes, it sounds like a downgrade but jk2 was abandoned because jk basically back-ported all the features of jk2).

Upgrade Tomcat to a supported version. 6.0.29 would be best, though sometimes it's prudent to stay a few point-releases behind the latest, just in case some weird bug appears that affects May 15, 2010 11:59:14 AM org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry registerComponent SEVERE: Error registering Catalina:type=RequestProcessor,worker=jk-8009,name=JkRequest15958 javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: Catalina:type=RequestProcessor,worker=jk-8009,name=JkRequest15958 at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.register(MBeanServerImpl.java:1123) at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerImpl(MBeanServerImpl.java:1054) at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBeanImpl(MBeanServerImpl.java:1002) at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBean(MBeanServerImpl.java:978) at org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry.registerComponent(Registry.java:871) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.registerRequest(ChannelSocket.java:436) at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:443) at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:352) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:743) Which is silly. Someone tweaked some configuration and didn't properly test the effects 2.