Segfault At 0 Ip Sp Error 4 In Libc-2.5.so
From 213.157.xxx.xxx:35841 to 98.129.xxx.xxx:47712 ulen 75edit 2: after running tail on the logfile, it is still running (actively transferring files). I'm not going to attach the core file here, as, using strings, I could see it contained names of internal machines I don't want to post in a public forum. Would it be too much trouble to get you to run up a lenny VM and test?I've found that the segfault also occurs when there are no torrents running.I just launched Is the ability to finish a wizard early a good idea? Check This Out
They display the directory for a moment, then the window immediately closes, but the browser shows up at the bottom of the screem for a few more moments. Same occurrence on CentOS 5.5 (i386). I changed the port back and have also tried the WebUI v0.380 WIP but its still occuring. The releases are built on Ubuntu, and those releases are unit, system, and stress tested. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2549214/interpreting-segfault-messages
Both rpcbind and sshd. That one caught the segfault.Here's the output http://pastebin.com/KEEiuqkM Failure is not an option... Does it fix this issue?I have chromium-16.0.912.75-1 installed and still have the same problem Offline #13 2012-01-06 14:26:23 Lennie Member From: Sweden Registered: 2011-10-12 Posts: 146 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with
Please follow these instructions to have apport report a new bug about your crash that can be dealt with by the automatic retracer. I thought it was my browser on the page constantly refreshing but even with nothing viewing the http page it still crashes. I also haven't messed with the "advanced" settings. How to explain the concept of test automation to a team that only knows manual testing?
Is there a way to export it? Please do not attach your crash report manually to this report and reopen it. So I am wondering whether the "so" will be unloaded when not being used after a long time and reloaded when nessaray ? I checked kern.log and found this: Jan 11 18:05:36 Ubuntu-laptop kernel: [30493.560717] tilp: segfault at 0 ip b7488d28 sp bfb56f4c error 4 in libc-2.8.90.so[b7412000+158000] running i386 ubuntu 8.10 with kernel 2.6
Log In to Comment Leave a Comment Add comments here to get more clarity or context around a question. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281622 Ran memtest86 for a full day w/ no errors. If that doesn't work, you can try swapping out hardware to pinpoint it. When I try to start chromium several times it works after e.g.
Yes, I'm having the same trouble with the newest official chromium. his comment is here If you get an error that you aren't allowed to access this report you will have to file it with 'sudo ubuntu-bug /var/crash/_my_crash_report.crash'. Offline #10 2012-01-06 08:25:25 Cheesecake Charlie Member Registered: 2011-09-08 Posts: 94 Re: [Fixed] Chromium segfaults with glibc 2.15? The tests I'm running for every release are not encountering this problem, so I'd like to know under what conditions this problem occurs so I can reproduce it to fix it,
Good Luck! I tried the gdb trace mentioned by Alan above but couldn't get it to work. unknownroad.com/rtfm/gdbtut/gdbsegfault.html stackoverflow.com/questions/13337472/… –RedX Dec 19 '13 at 10:37 That's why we compile with the -g flag, and use tools like gdb: so we can work it out ourselves, and this contact form It comes bundled with Windows.
I pressed the reset button and got a whole bunch of segfault error and it didn't come up. I'm not an employee of DO, so they are not liable. Dec 18 16:04:54 lat-ws kernel: [ 369.100461] nautilus: segfault at 746178 ip b7238d31 sp b5a24e48 error 4 in libc-2.8.90.so[b71c9000+158000] Dec 18 16:06:25 lat-ws kernel: [ 460.789403] gnome-commander: segfault at 71 ip
Since it's a shared library You're hosed, unfortunately; it's not possible to know where the libraries were placed in memory by the dynamic linker after-the-fact.
I think there must be a bug in the build. Hopefully we can get this fixed utorrent for linux works excellent on my local network. Works in GDB though17What can cause a Java native function (in C) to segfault upon entry?0Segfault in libc upon running statically linked application1Return-to-libc attack0Segfault libc Android1Why calling vprintf or similar functions If not, I'll try some torrents.
I googled it and is something about acpid, which I don't have installed and is also disabled in the BIOS. I switched to AUR's chromium-browser-bin and it's fine. My problem is that, the sgefault happened at a prod environment and no coredump file was left; and it rarely reproduces so using gdb to see where it happens doesn't work navigate here Share your knowledge.
Here is my gdb backtrace:http://pastebin.com/T47j8f2HStarting program: /usr/lib/chromium/chromium [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7fffed39b700 (LWP 2066)] [New Thread 0x7fffecb9a700 (LWP 2067)] [New Thread 0x7fffec399700 (LWP 2068)] [New Thread 0x7fffeb552700 (LWP It can also happen any time from 5 minutes to 24 hours after starting.utserver: segfault at 780 ip b76f9aa2 sp b667ef18 error 4 in libc-2.12.1.so[b7685000+141000]utserver: segfault at 9c0 ip b776aaa2 sp Reproduce the problem under gdb. Running monit to monitor the service and restart it is definitely a temp fix but sometimes I have some pretty big torrents and @ 450MHz it takes awhile to check them
Incredibly annoying (but beta software, etc).Let me know if there is anything else I need to post. Any ideas whats going on?[24456909.686116] utserver: segfault at 30 ip b7e742dc sp b6c7af04 error 4 in libc-2.11.2.so[b7e00000+140000][24478132.073589] utserver: segfault at 240 ip b7db52dc sp b6bbbf04 error 4 in libc-2.11.2.so[b7d41000+140000]Thanks Share this Also, after using yum, you should change back zlib to the newer version, and here's the steps: [[email protected] ~]# cd /usr/lib [[email protected] lib]# rm libz.so libz.so.1 rm: remove symbolic link `libz.so'? Jan 12 23:08:15 trahersa-test -- MARK -- Jan 12 23:28:15 trahersa-test -- MARK -- Jan 12 23:48:15 trahersa-test -- MARK -- Jan 13 00:08:15 trahersa-test -- MARK -- Jan 13 00:28:15
After debuginfo-install rpcbind-0.2.0-21.fc19.x86_64 I get Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff7415e29 in _IO_vfprintf_internal (s=s@entry=0x555555774dd0, format=
y [[email protected] lib]# ln -s libz.so.1.2.3 libz.so [[email protected] lib]# ln -s libz.so.1.2.3 libz.so.1 After these steps, you should now able to run yum commands without any issue. The segmentation was caused by overwriting a loaded shared object file. C Libraries listed below, which are significantly older than the others above, albeit current for CentOS.glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.7 Sat 30 Oct 2010 11:34:39 AM PDTglibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.7 Sat 30 Oct 2010 11:34:39 AM PDTglibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 Sat GaijinPunch View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by GaijinPunch 01-14-2009, 02:57 AM #6 Tinkster Moderator Registered: Apr 2002 Location: in